Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC" Results 201 - 220 of 782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Ravel again joined the three Republican commissioners to pass the rules, which were created in response to the 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:19 am by Jack J. Gravelle
Investor activism on corporate political spending has increased significantly since the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Elections Posted by Michael Sozan, Center for American Progress, on Friday, December 6, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:33 pm by zbrown
Since the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:18 pm
  There is, it said, “no compelling reason” why the Court should hear more than one lawyer on each side of the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 11:07 am by William McGinley
  The statute is anything but clear, especially when viewed in the light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:07 am by Eugene Volokh
“[T]he freedom … of the press” specially protects the press as an industry, which is to say newspapers, television stations, and the like — so have argued some judges and scholars, such as the Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:37 am by George Ticoras
The FEC had argued for the need for the regulation after FEC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Leland E. Beck
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449 (2007) (WRTL)] or [Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:53 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Commission acted in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:47 am by Rick Hasen
Press release: “Former federal, state and local election officials filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court on Friday, May 17, 2012 challenging the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:14 pm by Paul A. Prados
Danilczyk to submit additional materials on the effects of the decisions in FEC v. [read post]