Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC" Results 341 - 360 of 782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The Post says that the coalition’s “effort to hold specific board members responsible represents a new militancy in the fight to require companies to reveal their political activities,” which has grown out of the aftermath of the high court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:34 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Cillizza suggests that a survey might not look so sad now, especially since the high court’s opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by David Fine
Times reports: “The current confusion shows how a deadlocked FEC has been unable to keep up with tens of millions of dollars of outside money that has flooded the system since the Citizens United ruling legalized political spending by corporations and unions. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Stefan Passantino
By Stefan Passantino The United States Supreme Court has recently announced that it might be revisiting its uber-controversial opinion Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
  Granholm’s hope, however, may likely be too much of a stretch, especially for a conservative majority that found a way to run roughshod over longstanding precedent in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:30 pm by Rick Hasen
It also places the boycott alongside current campaign finance doctrine via Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:37 am by George Ticoras
The FEC had argued for the need for the regulation after FEC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Leland E. Beck
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449 (2007) (WRTL)] or [Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am by Lawrence Solum
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
It has already proved it has no problem shunning precedent or being out-of-touch, for example see Citizens United v. [read post]