Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC" Results 361 - 380 of 782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm by Lawrence Solum
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by nflatow
by Nicole Flatow A case that started out as potentially the most significant test of corporate personhood since Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As they noted: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm by Juan E. Mendez
On the one hand, corporations declare, in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm by Rick Hasen
Herrnson’s research shows that by the end of 2010 – less than 12 months after the landmark Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm by Rick Hasen
In 2007, before Citizens United, the Supreme Court decided FEC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm by Rick Hasen
  Here is the abstract: This paper seeks to understand the effect of campaign finance laws on electoral and policy Spurred by the recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:18 am by nflatow
Supreme Court order issued Friday, two of the justices called for review of the controversial decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:19 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a Montana Supreme Court's ruling upholding the Montana state PAC requirement for corporate campaign expenditures, even in the face of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Citizens United decision, the brief went on, should not control the fate of the Montana law. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Rick Hasen
At the same time, federal courts, relying upon the Supreme Court’s new campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Find out the answer and have a bit of weekend fun by checking out this Sesame Street appearance in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor puts down her taza de café (she and her host kaffee-klatsch in Spanish as well as English) and struts her solomonic stuff:Hat tip to Bridget Crawford at Faculty Lounge for news of this appearance, which follows fast upon the interview between retired Justice John Paul Stevens, author of a stinging dissent in the campaign finance case, Citizens… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am by Marcia Coyle
The political advocacy group, American Tradition Partnership, and two other corporate groups told Kennedy in their application for the stay: “The Montana Supreme Court held the Ban constitutional despite the holding in Citizens United v. [read post]