Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC"
Results 41 - 60
of 782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
., on Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Tags: Climate change, Comment letters, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Materiality, SEC, Securities regulation, Sustainability Corporate Political Spending and State Tax Policy: Evidence from Citizens United Posted by Cailin Slattery (University of California Berkeley), Alisa Tazhitdinova (University of California Santa Barbara), and Sarah Robinson (University of… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
In January 2010, decades of legal precedent were overturned when the Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
In January 2010, decades of legal precedent were overturned when the Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
While amendments such as the one Cawthorn filed are not uncommon, ones that show large changes can trigger FEC action, said FEC spokesperson Mills Martin. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
After all, "it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule," Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
After Commissioners’ Verbal Brawl, FEC Won’t Let Rep. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm
But that's not an approach you can embrace if - like many progressives - you applaud the Supreme Court's 20th century gutting of precedents protecting contract and property rights, and would be happy to see it overrule Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 11:53 am
Another likely reason for the increased use of section 501(c) organizations for political campaign activity is the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:44 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 8:53 am
Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:13 pm
In prior cases premised on similar facts, the FEC could not agree whether, following the Citizens United and SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
3/24/2009: Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:08 pm
The FEC, citing NAACP v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:05 am
Ever since the Citizens United v. [read post]
