Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC" Results 581 - 600 of 782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
I sided with the rightwingers who gave some teeth to the Second Amendment in Heller, and expect I will agree with the majority outcome by the rightwingers in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am by Lyle Denniston
In Monday’s order, the Court told the Circuit Court to consider whether part of the case is now legally dead (“moot”) because the FEC has scuttled two of the three regulations that the organization had challenged, and to reconsider the remainder of the group’s challenges by applying the Court’s January ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Mike Castle (R-DE) announced that they reached a bipartisan agreement to move forward with a legislative response to Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
The new appeal, in a legal form that the Court has little choice but to decide it, is an attempt to expand the impact of the Justices’ ruling in January, in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:55 pm by Erin Miller
FEC, which, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:12 am by Lyle Denniston
  The ruling significantly broadened the impact of the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in January in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:39 am by Lawrence Solum
This claim has become so embedded in constitutional doctrine that in the most recent Supreme Court case in this area, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Holder – Agreed 9-Sep Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:10 am by Lawrence Solum
This claim has become so embedded in constitutional doctrine that in the most recent Supreme Court case in this area, Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:59 am by Big Tent Democrat
Kentucky, and his brilliant 90-page dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court ruled that the GOP challenge to “soft money” contribution limits was not aided by the Supreme Court’s Jan. 21 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by constitutional lawblogger
Circuit ruled on Friday that the logic of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
FEC, the en banc DC Circuit extended the reasoning of Citizens United from campaign spending to campaign donations, holding unconstitutional a $5000 limit on donations to independent political groups (the “527s”). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:04 am by Ashby Jones
The BLT blog writes: The FEC had tried to argue that Citizens United did not apply in the case because the earlier decision involved spending limits, not contribution limits. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  The District Court ruled that the GOP challenge was not aided by the Supreme Court’s Jan. 21 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am by Lyle Denniston
—————– In the first major court ruling to apply the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:12 am by Patrick
Critics of the Supreme Court’s recent Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:42 am by Carter Wood
The Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises will hold a hearing entitled "Corporate Governance after Citizens United"The subcommittee... [read post]