Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC"
Results 741 - 760
of 782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Pruitt, Jones Day, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Reporting regulation, Retail investors, SEC, SEC enforcement FCPA and the Commodity Exchange Act: A New Relationship Posted by David Yeres, David DiBari, and Robert Houck, Clifford Chance US LLP, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Anti-corruption, CFTC, Commodity… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm
But we also indeed to adjust our expectations of them.Consider the recent case of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Here’s the abstract (paragraph breaks added; h/t Danny Sokol’s Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog): This Article addresses itself to two of the most significant political moments in the last decade: the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets Posted by James Andrus, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, on Monday, July 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, CalPERS, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:10 am
Schreiner, Monteverde & Associates PC, on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Discovery, Duty of care,Information asymmetries, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting Yet Another Congressional Proposed Corporate Reform: Proxy Advisory Firms in the Crosshairs Posted by Ed Batts, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 Tags: Brokaw Act,… [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 4, 2019 Tags: Arbitrage, Boards of Directors, Deal protection, Engagement, Mergers & acquisitions, REITs, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value Fiduciary Blind Spot: The Failure of Institutional Investors to Prevent the Illegitimate Use of Working Americans’ Savings for Corporate Political Spending Posted by Tami Groswald Ozery, HLS… [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:55 am
FEC, Disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lobbying, Political spending, Securities regulation, Shareholder Protection Act, Transparency SEC Reopens Universal Proxy Comment Period Posted by Laura D. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
For example, in 2009 the Justices heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
It seems highly likely that Justice Stevens was assigned only two majority opinions to write from the first three sittings because Stevens was also writing the principal dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm
FEC). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am
Martinez (2010); Seth Waxman and Ted Olson in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
For instance, concurring in Citizens United v. [read post]