Posts tagged with: "ECPA" Results 681 - 700 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 8:11 am by Venkat Balasubramani
AARP, 14-cv-1288 (KBJ) (D.C. filed June 30, 2015–see 2015 WL 4036206, amended July 28, 2015–see 2015 WL 4555098) Related posts: Disclosing Unique User IDs In URLs Doesn’t Violate ECPA–In re Zynga/Facebook In IMDb Privacy Case, 9th Circuit Rejects Hoang’s Appeal Lawsuit Fails Over Ridesharing Service’s Disclosures To Its Analytics Service–Garcia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:30 am by Monique Altheim
http://t.co/WWy2S7Os # FTC Announces Settlement with Facebook – This blog entry was contributed by Steven Spagnolo, an associate in th… http://t.co/rIDpHX7Y # Facebook Settles FTC Charges – On November 29, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission announced that Facebook has settle… http://t.co/H052DuDl # 250k users exposed in Naijaloaded hack http://t.co/NaSZSR0O # Facebook Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Consumers By Failing To Keep Privacy Promises… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:52 pm by Orin Kerr
Lawyers need to be involved at every stage, getting various kinds of court orders required by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), such as pen register orders, 2703(d) orders, and the like. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce Boyden
Hall is a pre-ECPA case involving mobile radio-telephones — essentially, walkie-talkies — that were easily picked up with a common scanner. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:38 pm
There is a long list of torts and crimes that MIGHT provide some control to the non-consenting party depending on the precise facts of the specific situation, including privacy rights (such as public disclosure of private facts), anti-child porn laws, obscenity, ECPA/wiretapping, copyright infringement, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, cyberbullying or cyber-harassment and extortion (if the tape possessor makes a "do X or the tape goes up on… [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
All three quotes rely on the same fallacy that Section 230 preempts ALL claims, but Section 230 statutorily excludes four categories of claims (federal criminal prosecutions, IP, ECPA, and FOSTA). [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by Barry Sookman
Target Corporation https://t.co/M13jDbKvy8 -> Éloïse Gratton appointed to the Board of Directors of SOQUIJ https://t.co/pIoIj5OwYs – congrats Éloïse -> Google, Facebook Put Heat On Lawmakers To Reform ECPA https://t.co/yFrmY1V0SP -> US Court: Police With Warrant Can View Private Twitter Messages https://t.co/FSL7pb8t29 -> Florida appellate court to hear Turtles' appeal https://t.co/BK7hsWTKb0 -> Video-streaming “Kodi Box” Seller… [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Hall is a pre-ECPA case involving mobile radio-telephones — essentially, walkie-talkies — that were easily picked up with a common scanner. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 am by Venkat
The ECPA sets forth a hierarchy of protection for user information, and non-content information is entitled to less protection. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
Enacted in 1986 as Section II of the Electronic Communications Protection Act ("ECPA"), the SCA creates criminal and civil liability for certain unauthorized access to stored communications and records. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:37 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The ECPA claim, as well as the Texas and California wiretap claims, fail because there was no “interception. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:22 pm by Monique Altheim
Big Data One code to rule them all: How big data could help the 1 percent and hurt the little guy ‪http://www.salon.com/2014/01/03/one_code_to_rule_them_all_how_big_data_could_help_the_1_percent_and_hurt_the_little_guy/ …       Children Online Privacy Maryland AG Gansler Submits Children’s Online Privacy Workgroup Report ‪http://ow.ly/2Cyc8W    Conferences ·      Watch All ‪#30c3 talks,… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
This case is in court because ECPA draws no distinction between two different scenarios: (a) U.S. government access to the e-mails of a U.S. customer doing business with a U.S. e-mail provider that happens to have place the e-mails on a server overseas, and (b) U.S. government access to the e-mails of a foreign customer stored on a server overseas by an e-mail provider that happens to be U.S. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:22 pm by Steve Schultze
This language implies that the government does not currently involve itself in governing the internet -- an implication which is clearly untrue given a myriad of laws like CFAA, ECPA, DMCA, and CALEA (not to mention existing regulation of consumer phone lines used for dialup and "special access" lines used for high speed interconnection). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Maker of WebWatcher software cannot shake ECPA claims on motion to dismiss. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Facebook Supervisor’s Post-Termination Access of Employee’s Gmail Account May Violate ECPA – Lazette v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/Q4vUYEosOB -> Disclosing Unique User IDs In URLs Doesn’t Violate ECPA–In re Zynga/Facebook http://t.co/zrTfPyXmZ2 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-05-28: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-05-27: Model to G… http://t.co/yDcsOu33Ui -> PM nominates next Privacy Commissioner http://t.co/Jamb0KFF30 -> RESPECT Act: SoundExchange Takes Steps to Protect Artists from Sirius XM and Pandora http://t.co/4yphuALKsv -> Whoops! [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:19 am
Egan - http://tinyurl.com/y46u72d Mending Walls: Information Sharing after the USA Patriot Act - http://bit.ly/c7SHHm New Look for Ontario E-Laws Website - http://tinyurl.com/y7887xx Pew Internet Report Reveals What Everyone Already Knows: Teens Like To Text - http://tcrn.ch/bzZDFy Police Data on Copiers Causes City to Scramble - http://bit.ly/bTHxzT Qualcomm: In Like a Lion, Out Like a Lamb - http://tinyurl.com/28vhdxp School District Snapped 56,000 Images on Student Webcams… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
The cases over the past 13+ years have taught us that 230(c)(1) can be distilled into a simple syllogism: unless the plaintiff's claim fits into one of the statutory exclusions (IP, federal crimes, ECPA), A isn't liable for third party B's online content or actions. [read post]