Posts tagged with: "FDCPA"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2024, 11:03 am
Practical Strategies for Debtors to Protect Their Rights Know Your Rights Familiarize yourself with the FDCPA, CAA, and CPA. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:46 am
In 1978 Congress passed the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") in 1978. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
The FDCPA was enacted in the pre-Internet era. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:16 am
I planned to practice criminal defense, immigration, civil rights (police and corrections misconduct), and consumer law (debt defense and FDCPA). [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:31 am
Plaintiff Marla Davis filed a putative class action alleging that defendant Mandarich Law Group violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by sending Davis a communication that was inconsistent with a cited California statutory provision. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 10:16 am
Older folks in Ohio have some help from the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) to stop debt collectors from being mean or sneaky. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
The FDCPA doesn’t cover debts you incurred to run a business. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
The court concluded that the alleged violation of the FDCPA—the defendant’s transmittal of a copy of a garnishment summons—did not cause tangible injury to the consumer. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
These are important disclosures of your rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 10:41 am
” In conjunction with its final rule, the CFPB issued an interpretive rule under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify the interaction between the FDCPA and the mortgage servicing rules in Regulations X and Z. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Supp 2d 340 (E.D.NY 2010), plaintiffs asserted numerous federal claims, including violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 USC 1692, et seq.; the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), 15 USC 1681, et seq; Rule 11 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure("FRCP") 11; the Federal Criminal False Statements Statute, 18 USC 1001; and federal criminal mail fraud, pursuant to 18 USC 1341 and 1346. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:45 am
The FDCPA has it's role and place and if the debt collection lawyer is acting outside the law, it is applicable. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
The Bureau indicates that its examiners reviewed the potential for FDCPA compliance risks associated with such state restrictions. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:26 am
The CFPB’s proposals only cover “debt collectors” that are subject to the FDCPA. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:33 am
Its Spring 2018 rulemaking agenda states that the Bureau “is preparing a proposed rule focused on FDCPA collectors that may address such issues as communication practices and consumer disclosures” and estimates the issuance of a NPRM in March 2019. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 11:03 am
Practical Strategies for Debtors to Protect Their Rights Know Your Rights Familiarize yourself with the FDCPA, CAA, and CPA. [read post]
NCSLT Litigation Moratorium? – Expect confusion, inconsistent implementation, and need for follow-up
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm
In other words, whether a collection suit is time-barred is dependent both on the law of the jurisdiction in which the lawsuit is filed (based on Defendant’s current residence, as required by the FDCPA), and on the procedural posture of the case, most notably, whether the limitations issue is even raised. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:23 am
The court of appeals upheld the determination that Liberty’s cross-collection practices violated multiple state laws along with the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Why is the financial sector going so mad over Madden when only Midland Funding and Midland Credit Management are afflicted and in need of Congressional intervention? [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
("FDCPA"), NCSLT's claim for breach of contract is not based on the FDCPA and does not depend on the resolution of a substantial question regarding that federal statute. [read post]