Posts tagged with: "NSA Warrantless Surveillance" Results 261 - 280 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm
The Obama administration is appealing the first and likely only lawsuit resulting in a ruling against the secret National Security Agency warrantless surveillance program adopted in the wake of the 2001 terror attacks. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:12 am by Axel Arnbak
The revealed MUSCULAR/TURMOIL program illustrates how the NSA presumed authority under EO 12333 to acquire traffic between Google and Yahoo! [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:37 pm
NSA case, we learn about even more vacuum cleaner approaches to domestic surveillance, except this time it ’s under the guise of the FBI and not the NSA. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:40 pm
The Vice President's office sent Pat Leahy this letter today, asking for an extension of time to respond to the Senate Judiciary's subpoena for documents relating to the NSA's warrantless surveillance between 2001 and 2007.I think it's fair to predict that, no matter how many extensions it receives, the Administration will not provide the Senate with the requested documents. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:45 pm
Just to pick one, it could be FISA court surveillance in that room. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:22 pm by India McKinney
The same is true of warrantless surveillance conducted under Section 702, but we’ve learned that for years the government did not notify defendants as required. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm by Kim Zetter
See also: New Yorker Sheds New Light on NSA’s Warrantless Wiretapping and Data Mining [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 8:34 am
The Washington Post reports: Vice President Cheney's office acknowledged for the first time yesterday that it has dozens of documents related to the administration's warrantless surveillance program, but it signaled that it will resist efforts by congressional Democrats to obtain them. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 9:01 am
WASHINGTON — Internet privacy advocates are doing the right thing by protesting warrantless government surveillance of the internet — they’re just going after the wrong government, a former lawyer for the National Security Agency said Tuesday. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:18 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It’s unclear how many Americans have been affected by the surveillance, though the program is presumably much smaller than the NSA’s bulk collection of millions of phone records. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:02 am
Bush left office, an NSA whistleblower has revealed that the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance program targeted U.S. journalists, and vacuumed in all domestic communications of Americans, including, faxes, phone calls and network traffic. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:49 pm by davidruiz
As for judicial oversight, the court that approves warrants under Section 702—known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court—has rebuked the NSA in multiple opinions. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm
While the ACLU has long objected to this large-scale, warrantless spying, with President Trump now at the helm of the surveillance state, the stakes couldn’t be higher. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:16 pm
In an important concession, the Bush Administration has said that going forward it will obtain court orders for wiretapping inside the United States, abandoning a program of warrantless surveillance secretly launched by the President in 2001. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:19 pm
In January 2006, shortly after the New York Times broke the story about the NSA's warrantless wiretapping and the government's Terrorist Surveillance Program, the ACLU sued the NSAon grounds that the surveillance violated the First and Fourth Amendments. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 5:36 pm by David Ruiz
Section 702 permits the NSA to target electronic surveillance at non-U.S. persons located outside the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:00 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
” Thanks to NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, documents detailing the top-secret surveillance program were published that corroborate what Binney had long said. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
   EPIC’s reply brief noted that, in fact, Justice Department lawyers had already made a formal argument in a federal court in New York against allowing the American Civil Liberties Union to challenge the warrantless surveillance program. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 4:56 am
The move comes amid increasing criticism from Democrats and some Republicans who say the NSA's Terrorist Surveillance Program has infringed on privacy rights and wrongly bypassed a special court of federal judges that secretly monitors classified intelligence-gathering. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by James Bamford
Hayden, made similar claims while secretly conducting the warrantless wiretapping program. [read post]