Posts tagged with: "NSA Warrantless Surveillance"
Results 421 - 440
of 689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Unfortunately, transparency about how many U.S. persons are affected by warrantless Section 702 surveillance stands out as a failure, with the intelligence community delivering inconsistent messages rather than the information that privacy advocates, the PCLOB and members of Congress desire. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:24 pm
The ruling confirms that NSA's warrantless spying has been formally approved for use in general criminal investigations. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:16 pm
Comey and others at the Justice Department had raised concerns about the NSA wiretapping program. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:03 pm
The law no longer requires the government to get a special court order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court to do so.The House bill (.pdf) craftily still allows that power, but only for surveillance where the NSA knows that both ends of the conversations are outside the United States and can prove that to a secret court. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:31 pm
The Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell contradicted the government and his own legal defenses of the nations' telecoms by telling an El Paso newspaper that the companies helped the government with its warrantless wiretapping program. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:14 am
If the NSA wants to get all of the communications to an email address (provided by a U.S. company) of a suspected spy or terrorist that the NSA believes is outside of the country? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
President Obama recently announced slight changes to NSA data collection practices. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 4:25 pm
Privacy News: Four days after President Bush signed controversial legislation legalizing some warrantless surveillance of Americans, the administration is citing the law in a surprise motion today urging a federal judge to dismisss a lawsuit challenging the NSA spy program. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm
On the surface, Carpenter, which the Supreme Court will hear next week, is a Fourth Amendment privacy case about whether law enforcement should be granted warrantless access to records showing where a cellphone has traveled. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:48 pm
So ruled two separate state supreme courts in decisions that take on the so-called 'third-party doctrine,' an outdated legal precedent that serves as the foundation for the federal government's defense of NSA and FBI bulk records surveillance programs. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 12:22 am
Finally, approval was granted and, at 7:38 that night, surveillance began. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
For instance, the bill narrows the definition of electronic surveillance so that the NSA could sift through your phone records, your internet activity, including your emails, without that being considered surveillance. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 12:37 pm
It concluded:While the legislation was awaiting Governor Rick Perry’s signature, news of the NSA’s PRISM surveillance program broke, landing electronic privacy back on the national agenda. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 10:52 am
Bush Administration Reportedly Rejects NSA Spying Compromise Bill More Known Unknowns in NSA Spy Controversy: Secret Appeals Courts ... [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 1:53 pm
US Warrantless Spying Program Targeted Americans, Which Violates ... [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:24 pm
In December, 2005, Bush, a Republican, confirmed a warrantless, domestic surveillance program by which the National Security Agency eavesdropped on electronic communications in the United States if one person connected to the communication was outside of the United States and thought to be associated with terrorism. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am
Media discussion of these FISC opinions has focused on those compliance issues with headlines declaring, “FBI and NSA violated surveillance law or privacy rules, a federal judge found” and “Federal court approved FBI’s continued use of warrantless surveillance power despite repeated violations of privacy rules. [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:59 pm
When it's convenient he'll talk about the warrantless surveillance program from its origin. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:37 pm
” The nearly 5-year-old case, despite its tortured procedural history, is the furthest along in challenging the Bush administration’s warrantless, electronic surveillance program adopted in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:57 am
If that was all that was at stake, it would be fairly easy to get Congress to agree to amend FISA to allow warrantless surveillance as long as no U.S. persons located in the U.S. were involved.However, the federal judge apparently objected to more than this. [read post]
