Posts tagged with: "Opinion" Results 181 - 200 of 264,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In a recent case involving Meta (née Facebook), the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an important opinion that speaks to the fundamental nature of corporate governance. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Coinbase, Inc., 55 F.4th 1227 (9th Cir. 2022). [7] Coinbase, 602 U.S. ___ at *3. [8] Justice Neil Gorsuch authored a concurring opinion. [9] Id. at *1-2. [10] Id. at *4 (citing Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
” This paper grapples with Unger’s concept of “revisionary power,” or the power to declare a legal opinion mistaken and finds that the project of Critical Legal Studies offers a home to those who challenge modern abortion law in the United States. [read post]
30 May 2024, 8:48 pm by Josh Blackman
But you wouldn't it from Justice Sotomayor's opinion. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:50 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Clears Way for N.R.A. to Pursue First Amendment Challenge; The unanimous opinion, by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, found that the gun rights group had plausibly claimed a First Amendment violation”: Abbie VanSickle of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:40 pm by Adam Klasfeld
Even though Carter spent the greater part of his post-presidency monitoring elections for fairness in undemocratic nations, including in former Soviet satellites, his opinion did not get much traction in the popular discourse. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Opinion, The Editorial Board, The New York Times. [read post]
30 May 2024, 2:47 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
As discussed in a recent New York opinion delivered in a medical malpractice case, plaintiffs are generally permitted to pursue discovery of a  hospital system’s procedures for vetting doctors that harm patients, as it may be critical to their claims. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Volokh, decided today by the California Court of Appeal, in an opinion by Justice Helen Bendix, joined by Justices Frances Rothschild and Victoria Gerrard Chaney: Appellant Xingfei Luo, also known as Olivia Luo, twice sought a restraining order against respondent Professor Eugene Volokh pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:50 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, in a brief opinion joined by Justice Elena Kagan. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:37 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"  Will Alito soon issue a letter or opinion in which he calls people who disagree with him, I don't know, "dumbshits"? [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm by Benson Varghese
It’s basically asking the jurors in the minority opinion to evaluate their positions carefully. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm by Benson Varghese
It’s basically asking the jurors in the minority opinion to evaluate their positions carefully. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm by Benson Varghese
It’s basically asking the jurors in the minority opinion to evaluate their positions carefully. [read post]
30 May 2024, 11:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Kavanaugh wrote the opinion in the third (Culley). [read post]
30 May 2024, 11:15 am by Unknown
A recent unpublished appellate opinion involved the applicability of Probate Code §366.3 to the case's particular facts. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:56 am
Maria Vullo, issued this morning.Justice Gorsuch adds a very concise concurrence:I write separately to explain my understanding of the Court’s opinion, which I join in full. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:50 am by Amy Howe
” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a brief separate concurring opinion in which he noted that the court’s opinion had suggested that many lower courts had relied on a “four-pronged ‘multifactor test’” to analyze coercion claims like the NRA’s. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
This is a non-precedential memo opinion, so I’m going to assume that the reference to “incorrect” was sloppily phrased and instead intended as a hypothetical (i.e., even if YouTube was incorrect)–and not as a declaration that it’s official Ninth Circuit policy that anti-vax postings do not harm the public (of course they do). [read post]