Posts tagged with: "cfas"
Results 641 - 660
of 936
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 7:13 pm
For a list of some of the "must ask" questions about model reviews, click to read "Asset Valuation: Not a Trivial Pursuit" by Susan Mangiero, PhD, CFA, FRM (FSA Times, The Institute of Internal Auditors, Q1-2004). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:06 am
Campbell libel ruling exposes ‘deeply flawed’ CFA system. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
If you did not get to read it when originally published, click to download "Pension Risk Management: Necessary and Desirable" by Susan Mangiero, PhD, CFA, FRM, Journal of Compensation and Benefits, March/April 2006. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:44 pm
Rule 1.5(c)(6) requires that the CFA show how expenses will be calculated, paid or reimbursed. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Although Hardeep Singh was ultimately represented by Carter-Ruck on a defendant’s CFA, the action was obviously a source of great stress and anxiety for him as he explained in an interview on the “Index on Censorship” website. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
The judge as first instance disallowed the success fee on the basis that as the claimant was never at risk of having to pay costs, because he had the benefit of an insurance policy for the loss, it was unreasonable for a CFA to be entered into. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
In the Observer, Peter Preston points out the important role of “no win no fee” agreement lawyer Mark Lewis in the exposure of the phone hacking scandal: “deeds that needed to see the light of day would have stayed in the shadows without CFAs – and that, without them, this wholly grotty saga might never have emerged”. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:57 pm
Susan Mangiero, CFA, FRM joins an esteemed panel of speakers as part of "Conflicts in Plan Sponsor and Service Provider Relationships. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:46 am
“Bumper success fees for lawyers in libel cases will soon be a thing of the past following last week’s ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the Naomi Campbell case, solicitors predicted this week. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:09 pm
CFAs are “no win, no fee” agreements. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
” – Claims For You solicitors' website “Mr firm only takes on cases on a CFA if they have a very good chance of winning. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
These flaws in the CFA scheme were borne out by the facts of this case. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
What will be the implications of this ruling for the Conditional Fee Agreement (“CFA”) system? [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Their solicitors, Belshaw and Curtin, had entered into a slightly unusual form of CFA with both of them although it is one that may well become more common in future. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Their solicitors, Belshaw and Curtin, had entered into a slightly unusual form of CFA with both of them although it is one that may well become more common in future. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:00 am
Human rights - On January 18, 2010, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), in MGN Limited v UK (application 39401/04) delivered a landmark decision criticizing Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs) as currently regulated under the law of the United... [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
The claim had been funded, in the House of Lords, by Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs) with 95% and 100% success fees. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
Simon Singh has some interesting reflections on the case and CFAs – suggesting that CFAs should be retained to promote access to justice but with success fees reduced to 25%. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 5:40 am
Whatever libel reforms are implemented, such a claim would be beyond the resources of most private individuals (particularly if libel CFAs are no longer available). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
The requirement on MGN Ltd to pay the fees, which had been agreed by Ms Campbell and her solicitors was disproportionate to the aim sought to be achieved by the introduction of the CFA system. [read post]
