Posts tagged with: "constitutional-law-digest" Results 661 - 680 of 1,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2021, 9:32 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Levy Center for Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lindsey Graham Argues Constitution Grants Him ‘Absolute Immunity’ in Georgia Election Interference Probe, a Response One Former Prosecutor Calls ‘Disturbing’ Yahoo News – Charles Davis (Business Insider) | Published: 7/13/2022 Lawyers for U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 5:03 pm by G-Bongiovi
What follows is a digest of an NAE seminar I attended recently, which aptly summarized employer-focused bills. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 5:03 pm by G-Bongiovi
What follows is a digest of an NAE seminar I attended recently, which aptly summarized employer-focused bills. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal election laws and regulations do not apply to media outlets unless they are “owned or controlled by&rdq [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:52 am by Michael Lowe
” New Texas Online Trafficking Laws Effective September 1, 2019 These two new laws become effective on September 1, 2019. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
He remains unsure that s.6(2)(b) applies to what are common law possessions. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
 The justices left in place a lower court’s ruling that the state’s so-called Disclose Act is constitutional. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Will Obama ever select a PTO Director? [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:10 pm by Gene Quinn
Having had some time, although admittedly not much time, to digest the Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Diana L. Skaggs
She maintains that CA substituted its findings for TC’s and misinterpreted the law relating to waiver. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
This is an interesting holding for those who are deciding which issues to appeal, and I’m still digesting how it fits with the recent holding in CERTIFIED EMS, INC. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It’s long past time to stop relegating the climate problem to a narrowly conceived field of “environmental law. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But a campaign finance law caps the amount of money a campaign committee can repay a candidate for personal loans at $250,000. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
As the panel summarizes: “social-media companies—even the biggest ones—are ‘private actors’ whose rights the First Amendment protects [cite to Halleck]…their so-called “content-moderation” decisions constitute protected exercises of editorial judgment, and…the provisions of the new Florida law that restrict large platforms’ ability to engage in content moderation unconstitutionally burden that prerogative. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:33 pm
Essentially I have scaled down my law school outline and broken it into digestible portions. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
Probably the most obvious, and perhaps enduring, lessons John Stevens has taught us are about the content of the law—what he thinks are its substance and objectives, as expressed in the Constitution, the laws enacted by Congress, the regulations adopted by administrative agencies, and other sources, including the judiciary itself. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Increasingly popular social media ads, including those engaging in electioneering communications that mention a candidate shortly before an election, are currently exempt from including disclaimers under federal law. [read post]