Posts tagged with: "dog sniffs"
Results 201 - 220
of 948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
In a earlier posts, I wrote about the Supreme Court's "dog sniff" cases, the former in which the Defendant was stopped while driving his truck and a drug dog eventually alerted to the presence of dogs, the latter case where (based on a "tip") the police walked a drug detector dog on the Defendant's porch, the pooch alerted, and based on that they got a warrant to search the house. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:22 am
A dog sniff must be accomplished within the time of the normal license check or with reasonable suspicion to be valid. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:23 am
After defendant was stopped, the officer told dispatch he was going to have to follow him to a checkpoint for a dog sniff. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:58 am
Defendant's hand to hand drug deal from his car five days earlier was reasonable suspicion to detain the car for a dog sniff. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:27 pm
Caballes.[4] This precedent has shielded dog sniffs from constitutional scrutiny by finding that sniffs of luggage and a car, respectively, did not constitute searches. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Other times that might dictate a snap of the leash are signs of diverted attention (i.e., stopping to sniff the ground or confronting a barking dog). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court held that a search based upon a dog sniff does not violate the Fourth Amendment where the dog is well trained and "does not expose noncontraband items that otherwise would remain hidden from public view. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 8:06 pm
• Allow a dog to sniff you before you pet it. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 9:49 am
If the owner says it is OK for you to approach the dog, always let the dog sniff your hand before you attempt to pet it. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Deploying a drug dog at that point likely would not call into question whether the primary purpose of the checkpoint is proper, and the dog sniff itself is not a Fourth Amendment concern under Illinois v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am
In contrast, a dog sniff from the inside of a vehicle becomes a search that violates the Fourth Amendment when “the officers themselves opened the door” and “facilitate[d] a dog sniff of the van’s interior. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
We love dogs. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
We love dogs. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The driver, wisely, declined, so the officer proceeded to let his dog sniff around, and when the dog “alerted” the officer searched and found a bad of drugs. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:24 am
Let New Dogs Sniff You If They Do Approach You If you cannot avoid encountering a new dog, allow them to sniff you calmly. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:57 am
Excerpt: Will the dogs sniff employees’ desks and belongings too? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:14 pm
Jardines: Whether a dog sniff at the front door of a suspected grow house by a trained narcotics detection dog is a Fourth Amendment search requiring probable cause. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:12 am
On April 21, 2015 the United States Supreme Court made a ruling on whether an officer may extend an already completed traffic stop for a canine sniff without reasonable suspicion. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:12 am
On April 21, 2015 the United States Supreme Court made a ruling on whether an officer may extend an already completed traffic stop for a canine sniff without reasonable suspicion. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:53 am
Important lessons include allowing a dog to sniff you before trying to pet it; making sure not to bother a dog who is eating, sleeping, or caring for puppies; and avoiding making loud noises and sudden movements when a dog is around. [read post]
