Posts tagged with: "interstate-81"
Results 281 - 300
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Blumenauer, Rep. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Jur. 3d, Frauds, Statute of, §§ 6, 81; Cal. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Suskin Jenner & Block LLP, Recent Noteworthy Class Action Decisions, Practising Law Institute Class Action Litigation Strategies 2011 PLI Order No. 28231 New York City, (July 21, 2011) Chad DeVeaux, Lost in the Dismal Swamp: Interstate Class Actions, False Federalism, and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 79 Geo. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Suskin Jenner & Block LLP, Recent Noteworthy Class Action Decisions, Practising Law Institute Class Action Litigation Strategies 2011 PLI Order No. 28231 New York City, (July 21, 2011) Chad DeVeaux, Lost in the Dismal Swamp: Interstate Class Actions, False Federalism, and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 79 Geo. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Iowa land is is some of the most productive in the world. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm
WHEN THE LITTLE GUY WANTS TO TAKE THE BIG GUY TO ARBITRATION Here is another rare case where an individual wanted to arbitrate a dispute with a business -- rather than the reverse -- and was thwarted in his quest: Carter v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
MAN-BITE-DOG SCENARIO: WHEN A BUSINESS DOES NOT WANT TO ARBITRATE A DISPUTE WITH A CUSTOMER Carter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
., 2019) the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that the Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children (ICPC), codified in Social Services Law '374Ba, does not apply to out‑of‑state noncustodial parents. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
The court rejected it more or less out of hand:We find that Congress has not exceeded its authority in this case, where there can be no question of the interstate character of the industry in question and where Congress rationally perceived a substantial effect on the industry of the litigation that the Act seeks to curtail.Slip op. at 18.The second anti-tort reform argument is that passing a statute barring already filed lawsuits violated "separation of powers" because only… [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
., 81 Cal. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:35 am
Por: Joel Pizá Batiz I. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
September 25, 2024In a family offense proceeding, the fact that some of the alleged conduct occurred years earlier is not dispositive, as “the issue is the imminence of the danger and not the age of the threat” However, the frequency and age of the alleged conduct is relevant in assessing whether there is “a pattern of imminent and ongoing danger to the” petitioner In Matter of Boltz v Geraci, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2024 WL 4229688, 2024 N.Y. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 1:55 am
If businesses had better access to banking, federal tax deductions, or interstate trading, prices would most likely fall. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:49 pm
The events and conduct giving rise to the violations of law in this action constitute interstate commerce, and a significant portion thereof occurred in this District. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, which held that the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”) does not preempt CEQA for a new railroad project, and that the State of California, as the railroad operator, could opt to subject itself to CEQA review without conflicting with the ICCTA. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
Earlier this week, I delivered a paper for Australia's CEO Challenge as part of Queensland's Domestic and Family Violence Prevention Month. [read post]
