Posts tagged with: "medtronic-lawsuit" Results 381 - 400 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2012, 5:42 am by Cal Warriner
Medtronics, which gave medical device manufacturers immunity in court if their product received FDA approval. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:10 am
Moreover, because "invalid claim[s] cannot give rise to liability for infringement," Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Medtronic, Inc., the government contends first that cert. is not warranted because the Second Circuit's decision was correct: the FDA's premarket approval of a medical device such as the one at issue here creates federal "requirements" that preempt state-law tort claims which rest on the manufacturer's failure to satisfy state-law requirements. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
            We’ve had the United States’ amicus brief opposing Medtronic’s petition for certiorari in Stengel for a few weeks now. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
Corp., 21 No. 40 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 5, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage July 15, 2011The Justice Department alleges in a Pennsylvania federal court lawsuit that Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. discriminates against women who are on maternity leave by refusing to insure their mortgages. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Medtronic, an eight-justice majority of the court ruled that many state suits concerning injuries caused by medical devices were barred by the express language in a federal law. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Medtronic (06-179), over the dissents of Chief Justice John G. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
Medtronic, Inc. (2008), to civil rights suits by prison inmates against corrections officers, Haywood v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
And in to litigation we go:From the Celebrity Lawsuit Department: Tennessee Titans Pacman Jones has been sued for a shooting outside Vegas strip club, according to John Day; Is a Kid Rock lawsuit far behind? [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Medtronic, Inc., 496 U.S. 661 (1990) (§ 271(e)(2) creates a “highly artificial act of infringement”). [read post]