Posts tagged with: "misfeasance+in+public+office"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Blair & Elizabeth Pollman, The Derivative Nature of Corporate Constitutional Rights, (56 William & Mary Law Review 1563 (2015).Noel Cox, Justice, Fairness and the Common Law: The Tort of Misfeasance in Public Office, (May 26, 2015).Michael J. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:59 am
Elsewhere in the committee release, the committee notes that public commentary was overwhelmingly in opposition to the Chief Justice. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
The prosecution barrister told the court that the CPS wished to review this case, and another eight pending trials and re-trials against eleven journalists and six public officials over allegations of misfeasance in a public office. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm
That is 6 separate officers, at various levels of superiority. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
The case was Mr AA’s claim for (as interpreted by the Court) “reinstatement and for substantial damages for his unlawful eviction, unlawful homelessness and for the unlawful destruction of his possessions based on the torts of conspiracy, interference with goods, negligence and misfeasance in public office, breaches of the terms of his contractual tenancy and pursuant to the Human Rights Act under article 8 of the ECHR”. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
For misfeasance, it must be shown that the officers misused their powers. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
For misfeasance, it must be shown that the officers misused their powers. [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:31 am
Something bad happens, either to one of the guests at the party, or maybe to a member of the driving public on the way home. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 9:31 am
The claimants had brought civil claims for deceit, assault, misfeasance in public office and negligence, and also claimed an infringement of their human rights under articles 3, 5 and 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 9:31 am
The claimants had brought civil claims for deceit, assault, misfeasance in public office and negligence, and also claimed an infringement of their human rights under articles 3, 5 and 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:32 pm
She ordered the public security officers to search deputy mayor and police chief’s offices, and offended murdering crime, which led to serious consequences. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Ontario 2013 ONSC 7244[1] The Plaintiff brings this action against the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”), its Chair, several of its staff members, the Crown, and the Attorney General of Ontario, claiming damages for misfeasance in public office and a number of different causes of action. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
The Supreme Court noted that while the public duty doctrine applied to nonfeasance by the city, it did not extend to "affirmative acts of negligence" or misfeasance. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:50 pm
“We do not reach the same conclusion, however, with respect to the claim for misfeasance in public office. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
13 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
13 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
6 Nov 2013, 3:31 pm
The Claimants allege a breach of their human rights under Arts. 3, 5 and 8 of the ECHR; and also civil claims for deceit, assault, misfeasance in public office and negligence. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:31 pm
The Claimants allege a breach of their human rights under Arts. 3, 5 and 8 of the ECHR; and also civil claims for deceit, assault, misfeasance in public office and negligence. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:25 am
The statement of claim in the action is 419 paragraphs long and is available here, and includes claims for defamation, conspiracy to injure, misfeasance in public office, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, breach of contract, and violation of s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
