Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 349,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
Flack, 51 N.Y.2d 692, 700, 417 N.E.2d 84, 88, 435 N.Y.S.2d 972, 976 (1980) 2 Nebraska Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
Flack, 51 N.Y.2d 692, 700, 417 N.E.2d 84, 88, 435 N.Y.S.2d 972, 976 (1980) 2 Nebraska Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:35 am
New Mexico and Smith but not Erlinger.The post Supreme Court OT2023 in the Final Stretch appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:26 am
However, the Supreme Court found that there was no violation of Muñoz’s fundamental rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:21 am
” The Supreme Court case followed Starbucks’ appeal of a Sixth Circuit decision that utilized the two-factor test. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:18 am
This marks the first time applications have been made following the Supreme Court’s April 26 ruling in Association for Democratic Reforms v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:17 am
Manageability Presently, under the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Estrada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a pivotal case that challenges the constitutionality of a tax provision from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, known as the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT). [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
––Affirming the district court’s decision, Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston, writing for a three-judge panel on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, held that the permanent concealment of the murals behind acoustic panels did not violate VARA.[18] First, the court dismissed Kerson’s argument that the concealment resulted in a “destr[uction]” of his works of recognized stature.[19] The term “destroy,” the court… [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
––Affirming the district court’s decision, Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston, writing for a three-judge panel on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, held that the permanent concealment of the murals behind acoustic panels did not violate VARA.[18] First, the court dismissed Kerson’s argument that the concealment resulted in a “destr[uction]” of his works of recognized stature.[19] The term “destroy,” the court… [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:20 am
#LegalNewsPostoftheDay: Supreme Court Upholds Law Disarming Domestic Abusers #law #legal #legalnews via @nytimes https://tinyurl.com/jcyftsnb - Garry J. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:42 am
The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal law that bars anyone subject to a domestic-violence restraining order from possessing a gun. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:12 am
United States, the Supreme Court upheld Diaz's conviction. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:03 am
21 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
The rights group noted that millions of Americans have been deprived of the human right to an abortion in the two years since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
SCOTUS: Disarming an individual 'found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another' is 'consistent with the Second Amendment.' The post Supreme Court Upholds Law Temporarily Disarming Person Subject to Domestic Violence Restraining Order first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:59 am
by Dennis Crouch A second amicus brief has been filed – this one from the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) – encouraging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in Cellect, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:45 am
From the introduction: Petitioners — the Legislature of the State of California, Governor Gavin Newsom, and elector and former Senate President Pro Tempore John Burton — filed this… Continue reading The post California Supreme Court blocks tax initiative from ballot as an unconstitutional “revision” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:44 am
In Department of State v/ Munoz, the Supreme Court today held that a citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country. [read post]
