Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 349,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 3:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] on Monday granted certiorari in Black v. [read post]
18 Oct 2004, 8:29 am
The Florida Supreme Court has ruled that Florida voters who cast provisional ballots in the wrong precinct will have their vote disqualified, even if they are legally registered. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:32 pm
It is "a comprehensive digital archive of all the available papers of the Supreme Court justices relating to selected civil rights cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2003, 2:30 pm
[JURIST] Along with Eldred [JURIST report], the US Supreme Court Wednesday handed down a second split decision reversing by 6-3 the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and holding that despite a missed government deadline, coal companies must pay into a federal pool to pay for miners' healthcare benefits. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Tuesday, including US v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:12 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday granted certiorari [order list, PDF] in three cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:16 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Wednesday in two cases. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] granted certiorari [order list, PDF] Monday in Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear one appeal this week, for three days from Tuesday 2 November 2010. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
At the Lectern reports that in today's State of the Judiciary speech, the Chief mentioned that the Supreme Court will soon begin live-streaming its oral arguments. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Thursday granted certiorari in five cases [order list, PDF], including two antitrust [JURIST news archive] cases, and three criminal appeals. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 7:29 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments Wednesday in Holmes v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:30 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Tuesday that testimony from workers who suffered job bias but were not parties to a federal age discrimination case "is neither per se admissible nor per se inadmissible" under the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:46 am
[JURIST] The California Supreme Court [official website] on Thursday unanimously overturned [opinion, PDF; case materials] a 2003 law limiting the amount of marijuana that may be possessed under the state's Medical Marijuana Program (MMP) [materials]. [read post]
20 Oct 2003, 8:25 am
The United States Supreme Court Monday denied certiorai to a case involving funding issues for Ohio schools. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:34 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has published its calendar of appeal hearings for October 2016. [read post]
24 Jan 2005, 11:33 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court Monday issued rulings on the Fourth Amendment in Illinois v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada has published its calendar of appeal hearings for April 2015.To find out more about any particular case, the Court's website has a section that allows users to find docket information, case summaries as well as factums from the parties. [read post]
23 May 2005, 1:03 pm
[JURIST] In a 7-2 decision the US Supreme Court [official website] ruled Monday that it is unconstitutional to force capital murder defendants to appear before juries in shackles. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 10:13 am
[JURIST] The Kentucky Supreme Court [official website] ruled [PDF] Wednesday that the state's use of a three-drug lethal injection [DPIC backgrounder] does not violate the constitution because the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment "does not require a complete absence of pain. [read post]
