Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 7501 - 7520 of 349,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division's decision notes that Supreme Court "properly denied a branch of the petition" because "the petitioners failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before commencing this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, and there is no basis in the record to determine that any exception to the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement would apply. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., April 5, 2024), the Alabama Supreme Court by a vote of 8-1, without an opinion for the majority, affirmed the dismissal of a suit challenging the use and disposal of church property. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division's decision notes that Supreme Court "properly denied a branch of the petition" because "the petitioners failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before commencing this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, and there is no basis in the record to determine that any exception to the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement would apply. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The post Today in Supreme Court History: April 10, 1967 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
When the latter sought dismissal of the case – via a motion for summary judgment – the Supreme Court denied the agency’s request.On appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, was of the view that S.R. hadn’t demonstrated he was qualified for the position at the time he was terminated. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
The docket of the Supreme Court was two to three years behind schedule. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
The Board denied parole by an evenly split vote, 2-2, with one member of the Board recusing.Finally, Drummond filed a brief supporting Glossip in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
And yet, last January, the Supreme Court effectively nullified EMTALA, at least for patients who require abortion. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:40 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court will decide if states can ban lifesaving abortions; A federal law requires hospitals to provide abortions when necessary to prevent serious health consequences; The justices could neutralize that law”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm by Howard Bashman
“Some Jan. 6 rioters win early release, even before key Supreme Court ruling; The Supreme Court’s pending review of a key federal charge levied against Jan. 6 defendants — and Donald Trump — is already triggering early releases of some high-profile defendants”: Spencer S. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:46 pm by Michel-Adrien
The Supreme Court of Canada has published its calendar of upcoming appeals that will be heard later this month.To find out more about any particular case, click on a case number in parentheses to find docket information, case summaries as well as factums from the parties and any interveners. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Born and raised on the shadow docket, the Principle has been underdeveloped by the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
The Court held that the Swiss courts had not provided convincing reasons as to why they had considered it unnecessary to examine the merits of the applicant association’s complaints. [read post]
The turbines take up the same land as traditional reindeer herding grounds and have since been ordered to be removed under a 2021 Norwegian Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The Maryland Supreme Court has been very clear that, in a criminal trial, “the credibility of a witness and the weight to be accorded the witness’ testimony are solely within the province of the jury. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
On March 26th of this year, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that further review in Amazon Logistics v. [read post]