Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 921 - 940
of 348,939
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2024, 1:00 am
Explore the Chevron Reversal Impact Resource Kit for analysis related to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn four decades of deference to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 1:00 am
Third-Party Release Tracker (Post-Purdue Pharma) – Keep track of how courts are treating third-party releases since the Supreme Court issued the Purdue Pharma DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker – Compare the key terms of over 25 DIPs! [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 1:00 am
New Resource Kit addressing Chevron reversal Explore the Chevron Reversal Impact Resource Kit for analysis related to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn four decades of deference to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes (including L&E-specific guidance on the demise of Chevron ). [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 1:00 am
Explore the Chevron Reversal Impacts Resource Kit for analysis related to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn four decades of deference to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 1:00 am
Explore the Chevron Reversal Impact Resource Kit for analysis related to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn four decades of deference to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 1:00 am
Learn best practices for advocating on behalf of your FDA-regulated clients in light of the new legal paradigm introduced by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Loper Bright and Corner Post . [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 7:04 pm
Loper Bright was describing the “due respect” the Supreme Court maintains is still due to agency interpretations. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:50 pm
“The No Kings Act Is About Putting the Supreme Court In Its Place; When judicial supremacy goes this wrong, the other co-equal branches of government have a responsibility to do something about it”: Molly Coleman has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:48 pm
“Harris and Schumer Target the Supreme Court; Democrats make clear that if they win, they’ll push measures to destroy the judiciary’s independence”: David B. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:42 pm
“The Supreme Court’s recent decisions could undo big Biden accomplishments; The end of a decades-old legal precedent is a boon for lawyers, small-government conservatives and judges who want to out-expert agency analysts”: Marcia Brown of Politico has this report. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:40 pm
“The huge stakes in the Supreme Court’s new abortion case; Oklahoma v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:38 pm
Gun-Rights Groups Ask the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:58 pm
Nine years later, the State Board of Equalization (SBE) adopted Regulation 1507, Technology Transfer Agreements, to implement and interpret the TTA statutes and to incorporate the California Supreme Court’s holding in Preston v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
Derek tries mightily to justify under the Purcell Principle the Supreme Court’s order allowing Arizona, in the weeks before early voting begins, to change one of the rules for voter registration in the state, but not all three of the… Continue reading The post Why Derek is Wrong about the Purcell Principle in the Latest Arizona Case appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:00 pm
(And if you’re wondering about a separate potential challenge based on the “dormant” commerce clause of the U.S. constitution, where state action creates an unjustified and significant barrier to free trade among states, such a challenge to the low carbon fuel standard program was already rejected by the Ninth Circuit in 2019, with the US Supreme Court declining to review.) [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
Although the plaintiffs in the case raised the Purcell issue repeatedly, the Supreme Court ignored it here. . . . [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:45 pm
Bad Supreme Court Math: A recent effort to defend the Fifth Circuit’s SCOTUS track record usefully (if unintentionally) highlights several of the most common methodological errors in efforts to marshal Supreme Court data. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:40 pm
The motion outlines a proposed schedule of new minimum wages based on one interpretation of the Supreme Court’s order, but suggests that ambiguity in the order leaves room for interpretation and therefore lays out five options: [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:40 pm
The motion outlines a proposed schedule of new minimum wages based on one interpretation of the Supreme Court’s order, but suggests that ambiguity in the order leaves room for interpretation and therefore lays out five options: [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:36 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit at this link. [read post]
