Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 9781 - 9800 of 349,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 5:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
A copy of the February 16, 2024, Decision and Order of New York (New York County) Supreme Court Justice Arthur F. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Coleman, decided Friday by the Texas Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Jimmy Blacklock: In June 2020, a small newspaper in Polk County ran a story criticizing a local assistant district attorney named Tommy Coleman. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Scholars recognize judicial underenforcement of Supreme Court precedent in a number of fields. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:22 am by Family Law
From NBC News: The Alabama Supreme court issued a divided opinion on Friday declaring fertilized, un-implanted embryos as children under Alabama law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
., Feb. 16, 2024), the Alabama Supreme Court held, by a vote of 7-2, that Alabama's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act covers the negligent destruction of frozen embryos created during IVF treatment and kept in a clinic's cryogenic nursery. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court would consider the constitutionality of this Executive Order in Korematsu v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
The court quickly dismissed the timeliness issue by noting that the SEC complied with the five-year limitations period in the then-applicable law.Almagarby next argued that the disgorgement award violated the principles set forth by the Supreme Court in Liu, which clarified that disgorgement “[can]not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits” and must be “awarded for victims. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
And here's the abstract: Before the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling that equal protection and Title VI bar expressly race-based plus factors in higher education admissions, many critics of affirmative action had pointed to facially race-neutral admissions criteria (such as guaranteed college admission for high school graduates near the top of their classes) as lawful alternatives that resulted in substantial racial diversity and thus rendered expressly race-based… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court ruled that a judge does not have discretion to refuse to issue a warrant under those circumstances. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The court granted the motion as to almost all the claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by Keaoleboga Molefe
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm by Lisa Kriegler
The Supreme Court for England and Wales (ESC) recently ruled that while doctors owe a duty of care towards their patients, they do not owe a similar duty to that patient’s family. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
And a Kings County Supreme Court judge agreed with that argument and dismissed the case.But days after that decision was issued, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found (in a different dispute) that Governor Cuomo’s COVID-related Executive Orders [Nos. 202.8 and 202.67 (9 NYCRR 8.202.8, 8.202.67), which had been enacted in March 2020 and October 2020], “tolled” the filing of civil litigation for a period of some 228 days (from March 20, 2020, to November… [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of lethal gas, in 1996 a federal appeals court unanimously held that California’s statute authorizing lethal gas violated the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 8:31 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- A consequence (predominantly negative) of the Supreme Court's recent foray into defining (however inadequately) the contours of patent-eligible subject matter is to give the district courts (and to a somewhat lesser extent, the Patent and Trademark Office) free rein to apply any Supreme Court precedent (no matter how archaic, ill-defined or incoherently reasoned) in invalidating claims on Section 101 grounds. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  The case was appealed, and the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision overturning the Appellate Division’s decision. [read post]