Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 349,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
A symposium on Robert Post's Holmes Devise history of the Taft Court is at Balkinization. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
“‘Good neighbor’ air pollution fight shines spotlight on Supreme Court shadow docket; The justices typically rule on emergency applications out of the public eye, but next week, a fight to pause government regulations on transient air pollution will be aired out during oral arguments”: Kelsey Reichmann of Courthouse News Service has this report. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:57 pm
The post “Capitol Riot Case Set for April Arguments at Supreme Court” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:44 pm
“Conservative Activists Are Ready to Bury Federal Courts In Paperwork; While the Supreme Court decides whether to get rid of Chevron deference once and for all, overworked trial court judges are already preparing for the worst”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:35 pm
“A New Study on Medication Abortion Refutes the Arguments Conservatives Are Taking to the Supreme Court; A study of more than 6,000 medication abortions obtained through telehealth found 98 percent were effective and 99.8 percent were safe”: Julianne McShane of Mother Jones has this report. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:32 pm
“Ski resorts’ long history of immunity threatened by Colorado Supreme Court case; The case involving a teen who was paralyzed after a fall from a chairlift challenges the use of liability waivers, which the resort industry says protects recreational opportunities for children in the state”: Jason Blevins of The Colorado Sun has this report. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:23 pm
The post “Hawaii Rightly Rejects Supreme Court’s Gun Nonsense; In a scathing takedown, the state’s highest court declared ‘there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public'” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:21 pm
“Senate Judiciary Committee Has Yet to Subpoena Harlan Crow or Leonard Leo; More than two months after authorizing subpoenas for two key figures in the Supreme Court’s ethics crisis, Senate Democrats have yet to issue them”: Andy Kroll of ProPublica has this report. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court at this link. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
Kerry Sun (University of Oxford, Faculty of Law, Students ; University of Oxford, Merton College, Students) & Stéphane Sérafin (University of Ottawa - Common Law Section) have posted The Nominalism of the New Nominate Torts (Supreme Court Law Review, 2nd Series, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
Judge Arthur Engoron of the New York Supreme Court has found former president Donald Trump liable for falsifying business records, issuing false financial statements and conspiracy to commit insurance fraud, fining Trump over $355 million. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 1:09 pm
In a landmark decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court provided critical insights into the state’s witness tampering statute through the case of State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
President Donald Trump at the New York Supreme Court on January 11, 2024 in New York City. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
According to the Supreme Court, if the person denying consent was arrested on the front lawn and is being held off in a squad car, a search is OK. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
” Indeed, in recent years the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized the multiple benefits of registration to a trademark claimant, including in the recent cases of Matal v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
” Both cases are now before the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:40 am
Also at that blog, Brad Snyder has a guest post titled “Taft Packed the Supreme Court — Twice. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:33 am
“Trump makes final pitch to Supreme Court in fraught immunity case”: John Fritze of CNN has this report. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
The Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s decision, finding that the forfeiture-for-competition provision was not akin to restraints of trade which are subject to review for “reasonableness. [read post]
