Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 741 - 760 of 3,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 7:53 am by Shannon O'Hare
Indian company law likewise has its origins in the English Companies Acts and is today governed under the Indian Companies Act 2013. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:03 pm
First, the Board considered Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:37 pm by Ronald Mann
The justices will hear argument next week in the trademark-infringement case Romag Fasteners, Inc. v Fossil, Inc. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
In 2016, Hale Devices Inc. acquired the Aiwa trade marks for the US, changed its name to Aiwa Corporation and marketed a speaker under the Aiwa brand.In 2017 a Japanese company called Towada Audio acquired Sony's AIWA trade mark portfolio and changed its name to Aiwa Co Ltd in order to re-establish the brand. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Continuing the tradition of a unanimous ruling for a first opinion, the decision in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:22 am by Rob Robinson
My analysis as a whole will be guided by the desire to strike a balance between, on the one hand, the need to show a ‘reasonable degree of pragmatism in order to allow interaction with other parts of the world’, and, on the other hand, the need to assert the fundamental values recognized in the legal orders of the Union and its Member States, and in particular in the Charter. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A story in the newspapers this morning has made me think once again about some of the weaknesses in Irish law relating to damages for data protection infringements. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:36 am by Paul Willetts
Employees, on the other hand, should be mindful of their workplace obligations, and be forthright and professional in their dealing with the employer and their colleagues. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am by INFORRM
The first was Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946, [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) … The Court of Appeal held that it was an abuse of process for the action before them to proceed “where so little is now seen to be at stake”, and duly struck it out. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
” Section 230 was prompted by Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm by Bona Law PC
You can find the other parts to this series below: Baseball and the Antitrust Laws Part 1: The Origins of the Reserve Clause Baseball and the Antitrust laws Part 2: The Owners Strike Back (and Strike Out) The antitrust laws and baseball finally intersect: the Hal Chase case The first antitrust baseball case fully litigated on the merits was American League Baseball Club v. [read post]