Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. inc." Results 61 - 80 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:52 pm by WIMS
"       Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Raimondo – that may determine whether courts will continue to give deference to a federal agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous federal statute as held in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 5:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
While I concur in the judgment, I write separately to note my discomfort with our reasoning, which is dictated by the regimes of deference adopted by the Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
When it came time for the government’s argument, Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston faced a barrage of questions about the doctrine of judicial deference to agency interpretation set forth in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
  Although commentators have handicapped the case differently, it is possible that the Supreme Court will overturn the deferential standard of judicial review of agency interpretations adopted in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:47 am by Lori
Rev. 1021-62 (2010).This article analyzes two significant administrative law decisions authored by Justice Stevens: Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:15 am by Kip Werking
I wonder, however, whether the law now permits Director Iancu to do something even bolder: create rules interpreting Section 101, at least within the limited context of the America Invents Act’s (AIA’s) post-grant review trials, such that courts may defer to the Director’s interpretation under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Randolph J. May
Under the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
" Id. at 46719.Chevron does appear [a lot]:In holding that the Final Rules are ultra vires, the court made no effort to measure the Final Rules against the actual terms of Section 2(b)(2), nor did the court give the USPTO's interpretation of that provision the deference required by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]