Search for: "Commission of SSA" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Social Security Administration (SSA) overpaid disability insurance beneficiaries by $11 billion from 2005-2014 because of insufficient oversight, processing deficiencies, and a lack of automated reporting tools. [read post]
Criminal Convictions The SSA may deny your claim for benefits if you sustained the injuries resulting in your disability in prison, your injury occurred during the commission of a felony for which you were convicted, or you are in prison for a felony conviction at the time of your application. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The ruling is instructive for any employer facing ADA litigation brought by the Commission. [read post]
17 May 2015, 3:55 pm by Georgia Employment Law Letter
Rules governing E-Verify participation and use As a condition of E-Verify enrollment, employers must sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the DHS and the Social Security Administration (SSA) committing to limit their use of the E-Verify system to the terms of the agreement and applicable regulations. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:39 am by Bill Otis
 In the version of the SSA that passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in the last Congress, Sen. [read post]
The recent issue of Bifocal, the bi-monthly Journal of the ABA Commission on Law and Aging has a great line-up of articles, including a piece by Social Security Administration (SSA) specialist Janet Truhe on Social Security Seeks Pro Bono Lawyers... [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:43 am by Gregory Forman
Someone who is self employed or whose income is heavily dependant upon commissions or bonuses will show much greater fluctuation in income than someone who works solely for salary. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Federal Employment Law Insider
If the employer allows an employee to change his identity and continue working, it must consider its obligations to report inaccurate filings with various state and federal government agencies, including the IRS, the Social Security Administration (SSA), and state workers’ compensation commissions. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Bill Otis
 Last summer, for example, the Attorney General directed that, for roughly the set of drug defendants to whom [the SSA] would apply, federal prosecutors are no longer to seek mandatory minimum sentences. [read post]
24 May 2014, 10:24 am by Bill Otis
Nicey rapes your eight year-old, you still have a defiled little girl to try to help.I do understand, however, that, in a sense, we have "new political and legal realities": A far-left Attorney General up to his eyeballs in race-huckstering with his buddy Al Sharpton; a Sentencing Commission whose majority is now effectively owned by the defense bar; and a bunch of judges newly at ease in snickering at crime victims.And I don't think SSA backers want to embrace any… [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:28 am by David Oxenford
  So we will be watching as this proceeding plays out in Court – as will parties involved in SSAs and those with potential new SSAs pending before the FCC. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:11 pm by Bill Otis
 In particular, it explains that, with so many of the SSA's objectives having been achieved in just the last few months, the prudent thing to do now is defer action while the country has a chance to assess how lighter sentencing is going to work  --  in particular, whether the massive promised savings will materialize, and whether, contrary to common sense and fifty years of experience, we'll be every bit as safe putting criminals back on the street as we have been… [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:57 am by Bill Otis
 As Doug puts  it:I continue to find the discussion and debate over the SSA an intriguing (and valuable?) [read post]
3 May 2014, 1:23 pm by Bill Otis
This new policy, which has effectively all but eliminated mandatory minimums (since they simply don't get charged) has been the state of play for going on nine months.Second, the Sentencing Commission recently adopted a sweeping, all-comers-accepted two-level reduction in Guidelines offense levels for SSA-type drug defendants. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:33 am by David Oxenford
There are plenty of other issues to write about – the tentative rejection of any other changes in the local ownership rules for TV or radio, the tentative conclusion to retain the newspaper-television cross-ownership ban, and the decisions on JSAs and the proposals on SSAs. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:38 am by David Oxenford
  The Commission also apparently kicked the can down the road on all other multiple ownership matters – not changing the local TV ownership rules or amending the newspaper broadcast cross-ownership restrictions, instead deciding to further consider any modification of the rules. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm by David Oxenford
” But beyond that, had the DOJ’s brief not been signed by the DOJ, there would have been numerous reasons for the Commission to give it little weight in its consideration of JSAs and SSAs The DOJ filing does not provide any factual analysis at all of the issues with JSAs, or any analysis of how many of these agreements promoted the public interest, and how many impeded it. [read post]