Search for: "Domino's Pizza Franchising LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 4:47 pm
Domino’s Pizza LLC, is an example of the greater protections afforded to employees in California working at franchise restaurants against harassment and intimidation at the workplace. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Werdegar dissented, finding questions on whether Domino’s retained power over termination based on testimony that its “area leader” suggested the franchisee “get rid of” certain employees (Patterson v Domino’s Pizza, LLC, August 28, 2014, Baxter, M). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:10 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
The franchise agreement between Poff’s LLC and Domino’s stated that the workers at the Thousand Oaks restaurant were not agents or employees of Domino’s. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:08 am by Robb S. Harvey
  Robo Calling by Franchisee using Franchisor Mandated POS In this case, a sizable Domino's Pizza franchisee (Four Our Families, Inc.) hired a telemarketing firm (Call-Em-All LLC) to help increase sales, and that firm engaged in "robo-calling" to offer pizza delivery specials. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:59 pm by AALRR
Domino’s Pizza, LLC, serves as a cautionary tale for franchisors and for franchisees. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Domino’s Pizza, LLC, the California Court of Appeals overturned the lower court’s order granting summary judgment to a franchisor and held that the terms of the franchise agreement did not necessarily govern whether the franchisor could be held strictly liable for the actions of an employee of the franchisee. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Meadow Greens Pizza, LLC, et al., No. 5:19-cv-155 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 7:44 am
  In this case, a sizable Domino's Pizza franchisee (Four Our Families, Inc.) hired a telemarketing firm (Call-Em-All LLC) to help increase sales, and that firm engaged in "robo-calling" to offer pizza delivery specials. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 2:28 pm by Brad Pauley
Domino’s Pizza, LLC (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 385, that the defendant franchisor was not entitled to summary judgment because several of the terms of the franchise agreement and the testimony of the franchisee raised “reasonable inferences” supporting plaintiff’s claim that the franchisee was not an independent contractor. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Boston Pads, LLC, 471 Mass. 566 (2015), the Federal District Court found that the ICL did not apply to a franchisor / franchisee relationship because “there is an ‘inherent conflict” between Prong A which requires the “worker” be “free from control in connection with the performance of the service” and the FTC Franchise Rule which contemplates a franchisor will “exert or [have] authority to exert a significant degree of control over… [read post]