Search for: "J. DOE # 4" Results 121 - 140 of 8,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2019, 12:55 pm by Gene Takagi
” “Notice 2016-09 also clarified that the filing of Form 1024 does not relieve an organization of the requirement to submit the notification. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
In this post, Part 4, I discuss the impact of the meaning ascribed to section 3’s “right to vote” on the relationship between that section and section 1. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a consequence, the LBA considers that it has to examine its competence.[4] The impugned decision does not explicitly mention the applicable provisions of the EPC. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”.[6.1.2] The Board does not contest that Latin is the official language of the Catholic Church. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Kevin Smith and Lindsay Colvin
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), at 1. [3] Id. at 26 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [4] Id. at 1. [5] Id. at 4. [6] Id. at 6-7. [7] Id. at 7-8. [8] Id. at 12. [9] Id. at 33 (Alito, J., dissenting). [10] Id. at 23 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [11] Id. at 31 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, not to generally excuse all delays does not constitute a breach of any obligation of the EPO under the PCT nor, contrary to the appellant’s argument, does it raise any conflict between the provisions of the EPC and of the PCT in which PCT’s provisions should prevail under A 150(2). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In its decision J 9/84 [4] the Legal Board of appeal explained that the main purpose of R 31 EPC [1973] was “to induce the applicant to limit the protection sought to a certain number of claims, in the first instance for the purposes of the European search”. [read post]