Search for: "Robert Schaeffer"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Taken in historical order, they were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:50 am
Key Findings The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) imposed an excise tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
Rand is so important a figure to libertarianism – think of Francis Schaeffer, John Courtney Murray, Bishop Sheen, and Robby George morphing into one gigantic Power Ranger – that any libertarian in Ken’s era of interest who was not a Randian probably felt some obligation to explain why not. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
In Kersch's account, Robert George and, especially, Francis Schaeffer, are far more important than, say, Robert Bork or even Antonin Scalia, who were, as is true of most professional legal academics, obsessed with techniques of legal interpretation, including, of course, "originalism," which most of "us" tend now to identify as a defining trait of conservatism. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 5:15 am
– Robert Farzad, abogado Escuchar activamente es crítico. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:56 pm
But the role of constitutional translators—such as Mark Levin, Charles Murray, Glenn Beck, and Robert Bork’s popular writings in more recent decades, and L. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
” In an op-ed in The National Law Journal, Judith Schaeffer points out that the “business community … sees much to like in Gorsuch’s record on the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) for the Boston Globe, Lee Saunders for The Hill, Raul Reyes for NBC News, Judith Schaeffer for The Huffington Post, Joan McCarter for Daily Kos, Rebecca Leber for Mother Jones and Dahlia Lithwick for Slate. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:48 am
Schaeffer of the Constitutional Accountability Center has this issue brief. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
Robert Barnes also reports in The Washington Post on the court’s decision to review the trademark case, noting that the outcome will have “direct implications for the Washington Redskins in their fight to defend their famous team name,” as does Adam Liptak in The New York Times. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
” In The New York Law Journal (subscription required), Robert Schonfeld looks at the effects that the Court’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Gabe Roth contends that the federal cameras-in-courts pilot program was doomed to fail, concluding that, “until Chief Justice Roberts . . . understands how increased transparency works hand-in-hand with the rule of law, any pilot program designed by the neo-Luddites who currently make up the [judiciary] will crash and burn. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Schaeffer is the Vice President of the Constitutional Accountability Center Whether by design or serendipity, today’s historic ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
” On Saturday, the Robert H. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:45 am
” Judith Schaeffer continues the Constitutional Accountability Center’s analysis of the Roberts Court in its tenth Term with a look at LGBT rights and same-sex marriage, while in an op-ed for The Courier-Journal she commemorates the forty-eighth anniversary of the oral arguments in Loving v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:53 pm
Schaeffer. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am
” At Slate, Judith Schaeffer looks back at comments about Loving v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Commentary on the case comes from Robert Everett Johnson and Paul Sherman in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal (subscription or registration required) and from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, The other argument today is in Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:02 pm
Schaeffer have this essay online at The New Republic. [read post]
