Search for: "*green v. Bank of N. O. & Trust Co" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
” For more potent mutagenic carcinogens, such as aflatoxin-like-, N-nitroso-, and alkyl-azoxy compounds, the acceptable intake or permissible daily exposure (PDE) is set lower, based upon available animal toxicologic data. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  The Sustainable Economies Law Center maintains a legal resource library,  Co-opLaw.org in partnership with the Green Collar Communities Clinic (GC3). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  He currently serves as the Co-Vice Chair and Secretary of the Financial Institutions Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar (2008 – present). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In his book We The Judges (1956), Justice William O. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
: A UPSTO green patent fast track update (Green Patent Blog) Concentration of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (Patently-O) Surviving patent reexamination (Patents Post-Grant) The more the merrier: The Journal joins the Times in complaining about patents (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in In re Tanaka: Patentee may add narrower claims in reissue, at least for now: (Reexamination Alert) (Orange Book Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Bauer for Defendant and Respondent. ___________________________________________ As alleged in this case, plaintiff, a married woman, obtained an adjustable rate loan from a bank to purchase real property secured by a deed of trust on her residence. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Spicy IP)   Cameroon Importers no match for Cameroon customs (Afro-IP)   Canada IP licenses and bankruptcy: Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]