Search for: "AC 6, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Molbert worked for Anesthesia Consultants of the South, LLC, and that morning ACS needed Molbert to help perform an appendectomy. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Following the decisions in Gulati v MGN Limited [2017] QB 149 and Lloyd v Google LLC [2022] AC 1217, one may have thought that a misuse of private information claim was more advantageous. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by Guangjian Tu
(This post is written by Chen Zhi, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Macau, a trainee lawyer in Mainland China) The arbitration-favored policy has been adopted by many jurisdictions across the world in recent years, as the support of arbitration by local judiciaries has been viewed as an important standard for gauging the business environment of a jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:31 am by Gene Takagi
One provision of the Accelerating Charitable Efforts (ACE) Act regarding private foundation distributions to donor advised funds may also be passed due to the Administration’s support. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
But it is an open question whether the transferor might still be secondarily liable (see, eg, Paul S Davies Accessory Liability (Hart Publishing, 2017) chapter 6). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:10 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And so they they scheduled their time for, you know, sessions that were going to be most relevant to them, Ignatius Grande  6:39 right? [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
IOA's 17th annual meeting will take place April 4 through 6, 2022. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Lauderdale) ban discrimination based on political party membership, both as to public accommodations and as to housing.[6] The D.C. law also applies to "commercial space. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
             The Appellate Division agreed with defendant that the court erred in its calculation of post-divorce maintenance under the guidelines prescribed by Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6). [read post]