Search for: "APPLIED COMPANIES V ARMY" Results 1 - 20 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
This applies to pleadings, process, hearings, awards, and appeals, although time periods for appeal are strictly enforced in many jurisdictions. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
Israel’s Supreme Court yesterday halted government subsidies for many ultra-Orthodox men who do not serve in the army. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
H announced his intent to resign from the subcontractor, but had not officially left the company until after the award was made to KPMG. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Beatrice Yahia
In Syria, warplanes and tanks struck Syrian army infrastructure, in response to three launches from Syrian territory, the IDF said. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
In Germany, O’Connor worked as a civilian lawyer for the Army Quartermaster Corps. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
Culley and Sutton contend that courts should apply the three-part test outlined in the court’s 1976 decision in Mathews v. [read post]
  The GAO ultimately identified 31 unique factors that companies consider and grouped these into five categories: (i) understanding mission needs; (ii) making a business case; (iii) tailoring contracting approach; (iv) testing and evaluating proposed solutions; and (v) planning future efforts. [read post]