Search for: "ART SHY, et al."
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 2:20 pm
62 zu Art. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 11:50 pm
September 2023Neues Datenschutzrecht bei Fedlex (Steiger Legal) Neues Datenschutzgesetz (nDSG) und neue Datenschutzverordnung (DSV) als einzelne Artikel (Datenschutzpartner) Neues Datenschutzgesetz (nDSG) und neue Datenschutzverordnung (DSV) mit Botschaft oder erläuterndem Bericht (datenrecht.ch) Neues DSG: Umsetzung und Anwendung in Anwaltskanzleien (Thomas Steiner, Anwaltsrevue) Neues Datenschutzgesetz: Anforderungen, Umsetzung und Anwendung in Anwaltskanzleien (Thomas… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
" Five federal circuit courts relied on the lethality rationale pre-Bruen to uphold "assault weapon" bans. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 12:32 am
O sea, salvo que la Administración pública tenga los fondos públicos bajo el colchón, al estar en una cuenta bancaria se presume “iuris et de iure”(ojo) que “satisface el interés general, es decir, una finalidad o utilidad pública”. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:15 am
Der Entscheid stammt von der Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) in Frankreich und betrifft ein Kontaktformular des französischen Innenministeriums. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:55 pm
Oktober 2021 erwartungsgemäss bestätigt, dass ProtonMail nicht als Fernmeldedienstanbieterin (FDA) zu qualifizieren ist. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:02 am
Este artículo, al igual que la norma derogada estaba diseñada en un sistema en el cual la extradición podría generarse de oficio (trámite interno para solicitar la extradición) La modificación de este artículo es curiosa puesto que no obedece a la principal modificación introducida a la extradición y que es la que dispone que se inicie a petición de parte y no de oficio por el juez de la causa. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
The refusal cites documentsD1: TSAI D-M ET AL: "The evaluation of normalized cross correlations for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2525-2535D2: TSAI D-M ET AL: "Fast normalized cross correlation for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2625-2631D3: R. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
11 707 400.II. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
General Electric Company, et al. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
Dwayne Edwards, et al., No. 17-cv-393 (D.N.J. filed Jan. 20, 2017), SEC litigator Lee Greenwood filed a January 4, 2019 letter with a federal court in New Jersey informing the judge that the SEC beli [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm
., et al. (14-1513); and Stryker Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 7:34 am
Durmowicz et al. does not teach a specific composition consisting essentially of the all recited components. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:33 am
Durmowicz et al. does not teach a specific composition consisting essentially of the all recited components. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
Corning Inc., et al., 2015 WL 6482374 (E.D. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
One well-regarded pulmonary text in particular gives the IARC and regulatory agencies little deference: “Silica-induced lung cancer A series of studies suggesting that there might be a link between silica inhalation and lung cancer was reviewed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 1987, leading to the conclusion that the evidence for carcinogenicity of crystalline silica in experimental animals was sufficient, while in humans it was limited.112 Subsequent epidemiological… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
Menell et al. as Amici Curiae 5 (Federal Circuit overturns district court claim construction at unusually high rate).Id. at *8-9.How to Apply New Standardwhen to apply “de novo”As all parties agree, when the district court reviews only evidence intrinsic to the patent (the patent claims and specifications, along with the patent’s prosecution history), the judge’s determination will amount solely to a determination of law, and the Court of… [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
And that is precisely the reading of RFRA that Hobby Lobby, et al., are arguing for in the Supreme Court.Observers such as Doug Laycock are absolutely right that, contrary to popular reports, the Arizona bill would not necessarily—and certainly not expressly—have “given business owners the right to refuse service to gay men, lesbians and other people on religious grounds. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:10 am
The recent UK Supreme Court decision in Vestergaard Frandsen A/S et al v Bestnet Europe Ltd et al, [2013] UKSC 31 [noted by the IPKat here] suggests that a higher standard should apply to this question – that the academics can be found liable only if they had actual knowledge or so-called "blind eye knowledge" of misappropriation. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
