Search for: "All Appeals Court Judges" Results 1 - 20 of 57,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm by Christine Kexel Chabot
The time-intensive historical inquiries demanded by originalism pose challenges for district and court of appeals judges with many cases to decide. [read post]
Notably, a separate legal challenge is pending in the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit against the Trump-era overtime rule, which argues that the DOL doesn’t have the authority to consider a worker’s earnings at all when determining whether they are exempt from overtime. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit to lift those orders while they appealed. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Maybe all symbols that have political or cultural valence should not be displayed by judges. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely postponed the trial. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
Fairfax County, leaving in place a decision by the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am by Eugene Volokh
The California Court of Appeals has recognized that a family constitutes a sufficiently small group. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm by Law Lady
Torts -- Defamation per se -- Trial court's verbatim adoption of defendant's proposed final judgment does not require reversal where it was evident that final judgment reflected trial court's independent decision on issues in the case -- Both parties were al [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
All it means, as Khan said in an interview Monday, is that “no people anywhere are saints. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
The Ontario Court of Appeal said no, but stay tuned. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:44 am by Cyberleagle
” (The court interpreted this as meaning all users physically located in Australia.) [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Casey, before the case went to the Supreme Court, the three-judge panel upheld numerous sections of a long and detailed anti-choice statute. [read post]