Search for: "Allen v. Merrell" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir. 1990); cf. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 89 F.3d 594, 596-98 (9th Cir. 1996) (affirming exclusion of Dr. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Expert Witness Guru
MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., laying down the foundation of admissibility of scientific expert testimony. [read post]