Search for: "Allergan Botox Limited"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
NGN are applying to strike out claims by Hugh Grant and Prince Harry on limitation grounds. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
Decision by the High Court The High Court unanimously held that Self Care did not infringe Allergan’s BOTOX mark. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm
In September, the International Trade Commission (ITC) decided to review an initial final determination (FID) in the Matter of “Certain Botulinum Toxin Products, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and Certain Products Containing Same,” Investigation No. 337-TA-1145, a complaint filed by Allergan against Botox products made by Daewoong and its partner, Evolus, a “performance beauty company”. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm
In September, the International Trade Commission (ITC) decided to review an initial final determination (FID) in the Matter of “Certain Botulinum Toxin Products, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and Certain Products Containing Same,” Investigation No. 337-TA-1145, a complaint filed by Allergan against Botox products made by Daewoong and its partner, Evolus, a “performance beauty company”. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:29 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:03 am
That said, in the 2019 Abraxis case ( C-443/17, EU:C:2019:238), the CJEU limited the scope of the Neurim exception to a minimum (see this Kat’s post on the Abraxis case). [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:37 am
” Passelaigue didn’t sign anything at the 2009 Spiegel photo shoot.In 2014, Passelaigue learned for the first time that her headshots were being used for an advertising campaign for Botox and on an Allergan website, www.skinmedica.com. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
Allergan, Inc., Civ. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Allergan, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
“Allergan unmasks anti-Botox expert” (April 28, 2010; updated Aug. 21, 2013). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Allergan, 2013 WL 389147 (W.D. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:40 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 1:05 am
Background In September 2010, Allergan pled guilty to a criminal misdemeanor for misbranding its Botox product and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fines. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Within 48 hours of Allergan a [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:11 am
Allergan] involved Botox (short for “botulism toxin”). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:35 am
Allergan, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
Each of them had been involved in the sale of Botox and each had signed a non-disclosure agreement forbidding them from disclosing Allergan's trade secrets and confidential information. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:39 pm
The complaint accused Allergan Inc., the manufacturer, of failing to warn about the risk of brain damage from Botox triggering an autoimmune reaction. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
And so it is, judging by a new sentence tucked into the Risk Factors section of the 10-K that Allergan (AGN) filed recently: “Many of our products, including Refresh®, Botox® Cosmetic, Juvéderm®, Latisse®, to a large extent the Natrelle® line of breast implants, and to a lesser extent the Lap-Band® System, have limited reimbursement or are not reimbursable by governmental or other health care plans and instead are… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
McNeil (EPLAW) Zymar (Gatifloxacin) – US: Allergan fails to secure new trial in Zymar case: Senju et al v Apotex (Patent Docs) [read post]
