Search for: "Anderson v. Reeves" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Anthony Franze and Reeves Anderson conducted their annual review of amicus practice at the Court for The National Law Journal; they conclude that it was another record-breaking year for amici, which has essentially become the “new norm. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
  Kenneth Anderson flagged Professor Richard Armitage’s topic for this year’s 19th Annual Grotius Lecture at the ASIL Annual Meeting, and he also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ed. 2d 538 [page 1682] (1986), and observed that "the standard for granting summary judgment 'mirrors' the standard for judgment as a matter of law, such that 'the inquiry under each is the same'," citing Anderson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
  Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
Reeves Anderson analyze the Court’s amicus brief docket and conclude that “amici provide information, perspectives and arguments that the court finds helpful to its decision-making process — even if the justices don’t always agree with their ‘friends. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Law Journal,  Anthony Franze and Reeves Anderson analyze the Supreme Court’s amicus docket last term, concluding that “amici continued to play an important institutional role at the Supreme Court, and that certain types of briefs got noticed more than others. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am by Garrett Hinck
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In the National Law Journal, Anthony Franze and Reeves Anderson examine the influence of amicus briefs on last term’s Supreme Court cases, noting that “amici filed more than 860 briefs, participated in more than 90 percent of merits cases, and, more often than not, seemed to capture the justices’ attention. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6276, Reeves v. [read post]