Search for: "Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)" Results 1 - 20 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Boston lawyer Michael Newman (Mintz) argued for the patentee Copan and was joined in the brief by Peter Cuomo, Andrew DeVoogd, Courtney Patrice Herndon, and James Wodarski. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:34 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2024 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court, Second Edition by Pieter Callens & Sam Granata€ 176 Artificial Intelligence and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Although there was supporting information from the Architect relating to external works of repair to stonework and further removal of pews and the rearrangement of remaining pews and/or introduction of chairs, neither formed part of the application to the court. [read post]
It is well known that the EPO Boards of Appeal take a strict line on admissibility of new elements of the appeal case under Articles 12 and 13 RPBA. [read post]
According to data provided by the BRPTO, in the last 5 years, 411 applications with priority examination have been requested for green technologies, of which 248 were granted and 151 rejected[3]. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:44 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
The case was the subject of the first public hearing in the existence of the UPC. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:46 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  The UKIPO refused the application for lack of compliance with Article 3(d) of the SPC Regulation which requires that the MA relied upon for the SPC is the first MA to place the product on the market as a medicinal product. [read post]
In SPC examination proceedings, the EUIPO will be supposed to issue an examination opinion within 6 months after the publication of the corresponding SPC application in normal cases. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:14 am by Simon Holzer (MLL Legal Ltd.)
The immediate application of the new case law of the CJEU to existing SPCs would have violated the principle of trust and good faith according to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:24 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Additional fee in the case of a divisional application – fee for a divisional application of second generation 225 235 235 0 0.0% – fee for a divisional application of third generation 455 480 480 0 0.0% – fee for a divisional application of fourth generation 680 715 715 0 0.0% – fee for a divisional application of fifth or any subsequent generation 910 955 955 0 0.0% 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:28 am by David Pocklington
Michael and All Angels Byker [2023] ECC New 5 Background to this faculty application is given in [3] to [6], and in the Press Releases of the Newcastle diocese and the Byker Community Trust. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am by Katie Cambrook (Bristows)
The SPC application therefore did not satisfy Article 3(d) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
The Comptroller was therefore right to find the applications would be taken to be withdrawn at the expiry of the sixteen-month period specified by rule 10(3) of the Rules. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
(3)      In relation to the second question, what circumstances must be taken into account in assessing the existence of liability? [read post]