Search for: "Asbestos Defendants (B P)"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To Egilman, it was obvious that material forces of capitalism meant that manufacturing industry was incapable of honestly defending its products. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The authors presented an adjusted OR of 15.58, with a p-value of 0.02. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
. , 536 P.3d 305 (Ariz. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Section 1112(b), unless it is filed “in good faith” (with the burden being on the debtor to show this). [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Introduction Causation is one of the basic conceptual tools of legal analysis. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
” As such, I can appreciate the ire of some of Selikoff’s defenders over the nature of these attacks. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
There are, of course, other target defendants in this litigation, and the actual case count is likely higher. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
In one of the very first asbestos cases I defended, the claimant was diagnosed, by no less than the late Dr. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Owens Corning, the court found the securities class action – which alleged the company misrepresented its exposure to asbestos claims in its financial reports – did not “arise out of” asbestos, but rather out of the directors misleading investors regarding the company’s projected financial performance. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
Given the huge variability in asbestos fiber type potency for causing mesothelioma, defendants that had products with some amphibole asbestos had to worry that defendants with chrysotile-only products would avoid liability altogether, or have liability for fractional shares of a single percentage point. [read post]
30 May 2021, 10:48 am
Kaufman & Charles B. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Such litigation can take decades to resolve, or may even become a perpetual motion litigation machine, such as asbestos personal injury cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
In addition to now explicitly raising a government contractor defense,[8] the defendants have carefully marshaled the evidence of Navy knowledge to show that the third condition of DeVries must necessarily fail: the manufacturer had ample reason to believe that the product’s users will realize the relevant danger.[9] [1] DeVries, 139 S.Ct. at 997 (Gorsuch, J., dissenting) (quoting from Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 5, Comment b, p. 132… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In opposing defendants’ petition for certiorari, plaintiffs noted that “Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
One of the challenges that the defendants made on appeal to the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Indeed, contend Defendants, these tests and diagnoses were not by treating physicians licensed in Utah, but by a physician who traveled to Utah with the sole purpose of generating asbestos claims at motels. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am
The jury rejected defendant’s arguments that a direct physical loss does not exist absent airborne asbestos and that a sample taken in one area of a building does not prove direct physical loss to the whole building. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
The Defendants’ Perspective,” 1 Mealey’s Litig. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
It implies that it makes no difference whether or not a student loan defendant has made any payment because the court will not acknowledge any such payment even when the creditor’s own servicing records evidence it. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
GOLDEN, fka TASHANNA B PEARSON, Chapter 7, Debtor.TASHANNA B. [read post]
