Search for: "Aspex Eyewear, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
Citing precedents such as Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Clariti Eyewear, Inc., 605F.3d 1305, 1315 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
Cir.2015); Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:14 pm
”);Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:15 pm
Cir. 2010) (explainingthat the right to sue is frequently “the most importantconsideration”); Aspex Eyewear, 434 F.3d at 1342 (describingthe right to sue as “[a] key factor”). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
Marchon Eyewear,Inc., 672 F.3d 1335, 1342–44 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm
See Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:57 pm
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. ,563 F.3d 1 358, 1366-67 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Aspex Eyewear, Inc., 556 F.3d 1294 (Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
While the PTAB has yet to decide this issue, it is expected that the difference between patent reissue and reexamination will be noted in the same way as done by the CAFC in Aspex Eyewear. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:15 pm
IPNews® - Aspex Eyewear Inc. came up short once again in a patent lawsuit this time against Zenni Optical LLC. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
· In Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:14 pm
ZenniThe backgroundContour Optik, Inc., a company of Taiwan, and sublicenseeAspex Eyewear, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:04 am
Judge Newman has previously provided an expansive view of equitable estoppel in her majority opinion in the case of Aspex Eyewear v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
§ 252 was analyzed in Aspex Eyewear, Inc., et al., v Marchon Eyewear Inc., et. al., (SDFLA). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
” said Thierry Ifergan, Executive Vice President, Aspex Eyewear. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
See also Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
See also Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:53 am
; Aspex Eyewear, Inc., et al v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:53 am
; Aspex Eyewear, Inc., et al v. [read post]
