Search for: "B P X Production Co"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
Here, in affirming a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark NUDE X for cosmetics in view of the registered mark NAKED X for hair care products, the Board found that, "while somewhat different in appearance and sound, overall the marks evoke similar connotations and commercial impressions. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:35 am
A P P E A L S - I N D E X
[MOTION INDEX FOLLOWS]
Decisions Released - October 16, 2007
1422 Corp. ... [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
R. 26(b)(1). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:59 am
These comments can be found here. **** B. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
“[A] claim for specialist consultations, surgical operations, physiotherapeutic or occupational therapy procedures, X-ray examinations, or special diagnostic laboratory tests that cost more than $1,000 and other specialty services … is not valid and reimbursable unless the services have been expressly authorized by the carrier…. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:22 pm
Barclays Short B Lvgd Inv S&P 500 TR ETN (BXDB) 5. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App'x 819, 820-21 (2d Cir. 2010) (applying Arizona law); Gove v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:20 am
P’s theory: this isn’t a real review website, but fake, and thus not entitled to protection. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:30 am
Number Word Mark 6363617 BADDIE IN HER BAG 6362805 MOCATI 6362711 PAPERWAVE 6362680 GRANDEZ-PRODUCTS 6362169 RUEGIES SNACK SHACK 6361015 EIGHT30EAST 6360853 A C ALMAC 6360507 MR. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Allstate Insurance Co.,130 S. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
“[A] claim for specialist consultations, surgical operations, physiotherapeutic or occupational therapy procedures, X-ray examinations, or special diagnostic laboratory tests that cost more than $1,000 and other specialty services &helli [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
(b) Unaccepted Offer. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
§ 600.2945(b). [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 11:49 pm
Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 207 F.Supp.2d 459 (4th Cir. 2003), AOL sought coverage under a St. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
P. 23(b)(3). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:56 am
Court, 612 P.2d 1083 (Colo. 1980).- Request court order opposing party to deliver specified documents to it under seal for in camera review to determine applicability of privilege/work product doctrine and/or to determine the appropriate extent of redaction. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
A lot of stuff that’s licensed, there isn’t any quality to control: these aren’t products/services w/any expertise in the licensor co. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[xxii] 4 Jack B. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
P v Q v R ~P_____ ∴ Q v R ~Q_____ ∴ R Hence, the term, “iterative disjunctive syllogism. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Evid. 503(d)(3)(B). [read post]
