Search for: "BARCLAY V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
The NCA found that 56 cash deposits were paid into Chawkat’s account at branches of Barclay’s bank by members of the Assad family in breach of UK sanctions, using money laundering networks in the UK and the Middle East. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Barclay, Trevor Guy, Zain Naqi. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:57 am
Mrs Philipp’s argument relies heavily on the case of Barclays Bank plc v Quincecare Ltd [1992] 4 All ER 363. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
A prima facie inference of copying is raised when there is substantial similarity between the original work and the allegedly infringing work, together with proof o the possibility of access (IBCOS Computers Ltd v Barclays Finance Ltd [1994] FSR 275, p.296-297). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:48 am
Napoli claimed to have engaged had been used at trial (id. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 4:46 am
To put that in context, the case involves the plaintiff’s effort to enforce the defendants’ alleged oral agreement to give him a one-sixth ownership interest in a options market-making business spun off from Barclays after he left his job at Barclays to help transition the business from Barclays to the new firm known as Rosetta, organized as a Delaware LLC. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC, heard 1st-2nd February 2023. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:18 am
Some recent, relevant spots from Bill Freivogel: Woroch v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:55 pm
The recent verdicts in Wm Morrison Supermarkets v Various Claimants (2020) and Various Claimants v Barclays Bank (2020) by the Supreme Court of UK restricting the scope of vicarious liability through its interpretation of the akin to employment test as well as the close connection test deserves scrutiny. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:18 pm
In the aftermath of the US Supreme Court's controversial decision in Kelo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:56 am
Supreme Court ruled in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 3:37 pm
Motorola (2d Cir. 1997); see also Barclays Cap. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
From Landino v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:53 am
In Philipp v Barclays Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 318, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the Quincecare duty does extend to cover account holders who are individuals as well as corporates. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
It criticised the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 1670, a decision that was later reversed by the UK Supreme Court: [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am
He is currently facing similar charges in the US (The Times, 5 July 2020). [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
The Federal Circuit agreed with the Board that Barclays Capital had not abandoned the LEHMAN BROTHERS mark based on continuous use of the mark in the course of winding up the affairs of at least one Lehman Brothers affiliated company and Barclays’ limited use of the mark. [read post]
