Search for: "BELL et al v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC. et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
American International Industries blew open the doors of Moline’s alleged fraud.[11] Betty Bell claimed that her use of cosmetic talc had caused her to develop mesothelioma. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
Sundance Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Plaintiffs’ counsel, Dickie Scruggs, et al., withdrew her before the defense could conduct an examination before trial. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
”[8] Parliament eventually enacted the Combating Counterfeit Products Act, which brought Canadian border measures to, or closer to, international standards. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
See American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Coalition for Responsible Regulation, et al., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
Eric Goldman explains well in this 2009 post about another case Pearson and other publishers brought at the same time, Pearson Education, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
Eric Goldman explains well in this 2009 post about another case Pearson and other publishers brought at the same time, Pearson Education, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Bell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
Supreme Court in Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
Supreme Court in Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
National Football League et al. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)… [read post]
