Search for: "BERNSTEIN v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Oct. 5, 2015) (Bernstein, J.), and Op. sur Appellate Issues (Phila. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Hill, Richard Bernstein maintains that “a ruling upholding the travel ban [in Trump v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the USA, one of the major musical works collection societies (and there are now four!) [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It is therefore unclear whether advocacy demonstrating reasons for other outcomes is a successful strategy for debiasing.Greg Mandel (Professor, Temple University Law School, USA) summarized his original research on hindsight bias in patent law.[7]Mandel found, in an experimental study with mock jurors, a strong effect of hindsight bias. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith for The Daily Beast, Lisa Keen of Keen News Service, Jonathan Bernstein at Bloomberg, the editorial board of USA Today and Ronald Cass at USA Today. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2015, Mew J in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the libel case of Bernstein v Poon 2015 ONSC 155. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Commentary on Fisher includes a post at SALTLAW blog by a group of Latino and Latina law professors, who respond to a post by David Bernstein as part of this blog’s post-decision symposium on the case. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
  At the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin covers Reichle v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Bernstein discusses (and asks readers for suggestions on) which Court cases have the most “ridiculous reasoning. [read post]