Search for: "Back v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Jarkesy to go much further, as it has done in conjuring new constitutional principles, such as the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
  The investment industry has tried to push back, "pressing the importance of environmental, social and governance considerations in U.S. financial markets ahead of an expected pushback from Republican Party aligned officials as they take control of the House. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
In fact, this fall, a proposal to tax nicotine products like cigarettes has been part of the funding package for the Build Back Better agenda.[22] Moreover, th [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:53 pm by Lydia Estep
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Scotland MSPs have backed the general principles of the Scottish Government’s Defamation and Malicious Publication Bill, which reforms defamation law in Scotland. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
See Jan Rigby, et al., “Can physical trauma cause breast cancer? [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  (Filed by a university employer and two individuals.)The petition not distributed to the Justices is Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– Pacific Daily News, July 27, 2010 District Court of Guam Chief Judge Frances Tydingco-Gatewood approved a months-old consent decree between the federal government and Mobil Oil that requires the company to pay $2.4 million in penalties for allegedly violating the Clean Air Act on Guam and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Caperton, et al., v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:24 pm
One reason is because the NAACP initiated litigation against the segregated school system in the case Davis et al. v. [read post]