Search for: "Banks v. Biden" Results 1 - 20 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
President Joe Biden and leaders in the UK, Austria, and the Czech Republic have denounced the Prosecutor’s move as outrageous “false equivalency. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
The Biden administration’s notice of decision reinstating the waiver was followed by the Ohio v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 24, 2024, President Biden signed into law the 21st Century Peace through Strength Act (the Act) as part of a broader foreign aid package providing funding to Taiwan, Ukraine, and Israel. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Owns or Operates Financial Services Sector Infrastructure The entity owns or operates any legal entity that qualifies as one or more of the financial services entities specified in the Proposed Regulation, including (i) A banking or other organization regulated by the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, or the FDIC under certain regulations; (ii) A federally insured credit union regulated by the NCUA under a specific regulation; (iii) A designated contract market, swap execution facility,… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Executive Order Summary Prohibited and Restricted Data Transactions Underscoring that the EO is not primarily driven by data protection concerns, President Biden used his national security authority under the Constitution, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The Biden-Harris Administration’s release of the United States’ second National Action Plan (NAP) on Responsible Business Conduct reflects a whole-of-government commitment to strengthen RBC. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm by Amy Howe
Representing the NRA, David Cole of the American Civil Liberties Union characterized the case as a “straightforward” application of the court’s 1963 decision in Bantam Books v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm by Amy Howe
Although she could have criticized the NRA or reminded insurance companies and banks about their legal obligations without violating the First Amendment, they observe, the Supreme Court ruled in 1963 in Bantam Books v. [read post]