Search for: "Barfield v. Wright" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Phigenix v. Immunogen, the CAPC discusses the "injury in fact" requirement for standing in appeals from USPTO decisions
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wang Labs., Inc., 922F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 1991); Barfield v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/