Search for: "Barrett v. United States of America" Results 1 - 20 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  Mitchell’s lead argument, to which he devoted far more pages in his briefs than any other, was that although Donald Trump served as “the President of the United States of America,” Art. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
By 1868, the First Insurrection was deeply seared into America's historical memory. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm by Brett Natarelli
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]