Search for: "Baxter v. Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Nonetheless, Judge Jones, in his published decision, clearly rejected all the plaintiffs’ witnesses and affiants, including Egilman, in their efforts to make a case for silicone as a cause of autoimmune disease. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Jones. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Jones v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:08 am
” Flores Castro v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:08 am
” Flores Castro v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
Jones had a full-blown Rule 702 attack on the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses before him, in a case remanded from MDL 926. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Jones v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Baxter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Baxter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
See Hall v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]