Search for: "Baxter v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
The facts of Peter Schmidt, about a winding up petition, and JK v MK, about a consensual divorce, were very different from those in the present case. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
Samuel Beswick is an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia Peter A. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
” The obituary quoted Professor Peter H. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  These pirate sites have no intention of subjecting themselves to the jurisdiction of U.S. courts but want the benefits of U.S. law, all the while marketing themselves in the U.S. in direct competition with the creators, including creators, whose works they steal.[10] The digital pirates’ fascination with creating these offshore “pirate utopias” (or “Temporary Autonomous Zones” or “TAZ”) dates back to the 1991 hacker’s handbook by the anarchist… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
* "Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose" (season 3, episode 4): Peter Boyle as a sardonic psychic. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]